© Copyright 1991-2002 by the University of Washington. Written by Joseph Felsenstein. Permission is granted to copy this document provided that no fee is charged for it and that this copyright notice is not removed.
This program implements the contrasts calculation described in my 1985 paper on the comparative method (Felsenstein, 1985d). It reads in a data set of the standard quantitative characters sort, and also a tree from the treefile. It then forms the contrasts between species that, according to that tree, are statistically independent. This is done for each character. The contrasts are all standardized by branch lengths (actually, square roots of branch lengths).
The method is explained in the 1985 paper. It assumes a Brownian motion model. This model was introduced by Edwards and Cavalli-Sforza (1964; Cavalli-Sforza and Edwards, 1967) as an approximation to the evolution of gene frequencies. I have discussed (Felsenstein, 1973b, 1981c, 1985d, 1988b) the difficulties inherent in using it as a model for the evolution of quantitative characters. Chief among these is that the characters do not necessarily evolve independently or at equal rates. This program allows one to evaluate this, if there is independent information on the phylogeny. You can compute the variance of the contrasts for each character, as a measure of the variance accumulating per unit branch length. You can also test covariances of characters.
The input file is as described in the continuous characters documentation file above, for the case of continuous quantitative characters (not gene frequencies). Options are selected using a menu:
Continuous character comparative analysis, version 3.6a3 Settings for this run: W within-population variation in data? No, species values are means R Print out correlations and regressions? Yes A LRT test of no phylogenetic component? Yes, with and without VarA C Print out contrasts? No M Analyze multiple trees? No 0 Terminal type (IBM PC, ANSI, none)? (none) 1 Print out the data at start of run No 2 Print indications of progress of run Yes Y to accept these or type the letter for one to change |
Option W makes the program expect not means of the phenotypes in each species, but phenotypes of individual specimens. The details of the input file format in that case are given below. In that case the program estimates the covariances of the phenotypic change, as well as covariances of within-species phenotypic variation. The model used is similar to (but not identical to) that of Lynch (1990). The algorithms used differ from the ones he gives in that paper. They will be described in a forthcoming paper by me. In the case that has within-species samples contrasts are used by the program, but it does not make sense to write them out to an output file for direct analysis. They are of two kinds, contrasts within species and contrasts between species. The former are affected only by the within-species phenotypic covariation, but the latter are affected by both within- and between-species covariation. CONTRAST infers these two kinds of covariances and writes the estimates out.
M is similar to the usual multiple data sets input option, but is used here to allow multiple trees to be read from the treefile, not multiple data sets to be read from the input file. In this way you can use bootstrapping on the data that estimated these trees, get multiple bootstrap estimates of the tree, and then use the M option to make multiple analyses of the contrasts and the covariances, correlations, and regressions. In this way (Felsenstein, 1988b) you can assess the effect of the inaccuracy of the trees on your estimates of these statistics.
R allows you to turn off or on the printing out of the statistics. If it is off only the contrasts will be printed out (unless option 1 is selected). With only the contrasts printed out, they are in a simple array that is in a form that many statistics packages should be able to read. The contrasts are rows, and each row has one contrast for each character. Any multivariate statistics package should be able to analyze these (but keep in mind that the contrasts have, by virtue of the way they are generated, expectation zero, so all regressions must pass through the origin). If the W option has been set to analyze within-species as well as between-species variation, the R option does not appear in the menu as the regression and correlation statistics should always be computed in that case.
As usual, the tree file has the default name intree. It should contain the desired tree or trees. These can be either in bifurcating form, or may have the bottommost fork be a trifurcation (it should not matter which of these ways you present the tree). The tree must, of course, have branch lengths.
If you have a molecular data set (for example) and also, on the same species, quantitative measurements, here is how you can allow for the uncertainty of yor estimate of the tree. Use SEQBOOT to generate multiple data sets from your molecular data. Then, whichever method you use to analyze it (the relevant ones are those that produce estimates of the branch lengths: DNAML, DNAMLK, FITCH, KITSCH, and NEIGHBOR -- the latter three require you to use DNADIST to turn the bootstrap data sets into multiple distance matrices), you should use the Multiple Data Sets option of that program. This will result in a tree file with many trees on it. Then use this tree file with the input file containing your continuous quantitative characters, choosing the Multiple Trees (M) option. You will get one set of contrasts and statistics for each tree in the tree file. At the moment there is no overall summary: you will have to tabulate these by hand. A similar process can be followed if you have restriction sites data (using RESTML) or gene frequencies data.
The statistics that are printed out include the covariances between all pairs of characters, the regressions of each character on each other (column j is regressed on row i), and the correlations between all pairs of characters. In assessing degress of freedom it is important to realize that each contrast was taken to have expectation zero, which is known because each contrast could as easily have been computed xi-xj instead of xj-xi. Thus there is no loss of a degree of freedom for estimation of a mean. The degrees of freedom is thus the same as the number of contrasts, namely one less than the number of species (tips). If you feed these contrasts into a multivariate statistics program make sure that it knows that each variable has expectation exactly zero.
10 5 Alpha 2 2.01 5.3 1.5 -3.41 0.3 1.98 4.3 2.1 -2.98 0.45 Gammarus 3 6.57 3.1 2.0 -1.89 0.6 7.62 3.4 1.9 -2.01 0.7 6.02 3.0 1.9 -2.03 0.6 ... |
number of species, number of characters name of 1st species, # of individuals data for individual #1 data for individual #2 name of 2nd species, # of individuals data for individual #1 data for individual #2 data for individual #3 (and so on) |
The covariances, correlations, and regressions for the "additive" (between-species evolutionary variation) and "environmental" (within-species phenotypic variation) are printed out (the maximum likelihood estimates of each). The program also estimates the within-species phenotypic variation in the case where the between-species evolutionary covariances are forced to be zero. The log-likelihoods of these two cases are compared and a likelihood ratio test (LRT) is carried out. The program prints the result of this test as a chi-square variate, and gives the number of degrees of freedom of the LRT. You have to look up the chi-square variable on a table of the chi-square distribution.
The log-likelihood of the data under the models with and without between-species For the moment the program cannot handle the case where within-species variation is to be taken into account but where only species means are available. (It can handle cases where some species have only one member in their sample).
We hope to fix this soon. We are also on our way to incorporating full-sib, half-sib, or clonal groups within species, so as to do one analysis for within-species genetic and between-species phylogenetic variation.
The data set used as an example below is the example from a paper by Michael Lynch (1990), his characters having been log-transformed. In the case where there is only one specimen per species, Lynch's model is identical to our model of within-species variation (for multiple individuals per species it is not a subcase of his model).
5 2
Homo 4.09434 4.74493
Pongo 3.61092 3.33220
Macaca 2.37024 3.36730
Ateles 2.02815 2.89037
Galago -1.46968 2.30259
|
((((Homo:0.21,Pongo:0.21):0.28,Macaca:0.49):0.13,Ateles:0.62):0.38,Galago:1.00); |
Continuous character contrasts analysis, version 3.6a3
5 Populations, 2 Characters
Name Phenotypes
---- ----------
Homo 4.09434 4.74493
Pongo 3.61092 3.33220
Macaca 2.37024 3.36730
Ateles 2.02815 2.89037
Galago -1.46968 2.30259
Covariance matrix
---------- ------
4.1991 1.3844
1.3844 0.7125
Regressions (columns on rows)
----------- -------- -- -----
1.0000 0.3297
1.9430 1.0000
Correlations
------------
1.0000 0.8004
0.8004 1.0000
|